IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rptpxx/v13y2012i2p213-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indigenous State Planning as Inter-Institutional Capacity Development: The Evolution of “Government-to-Government” Relations in Coastal British Columbia, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Janice Barry

Abstract

Known for a large concentration of unlogged watersheds and the presence of the white spirit bear, British Columbia's Central Coast was also a key site in a larger re-imagining of the possibilities for government-to-government (G2G) planning between Indigenous peoples (First Nations) and the state. This paper explores the evolution of G2G planning: how external forces within the broader institutional system were interpreted and embodied in the strategic actions of various collaborative actors. Significant legal changes coalesced with an unstable timber market to fundamentally alter the discursive and political terrain of British Columbian natural resource planning. New coalitions and alliances were formed, and previously held conventions regarding both the process and outcomes of planning were challenged. These changes are analysed through the Institutional Capacity Development Framework, which frames institutional change as a measure of actors' ability to mobilise existing and emergent institutional resources. As one of the few empirical studies to apply the framework, this paper proposes several modifications to improve its conceptual clarity and to underscore the importance of changing political identities.

Suggested Citation

  • Janice Barry, 2012. "Indigenous State Planning as Inter-Institutional Capacity Development: The Evolution of “Government-to-Government” Relations in Coastal British Columbia, Canada," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 213-231.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:13:y:2012:i:2:p:213-231
    DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14649357.2012.677122
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14649357.2012.677122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:13:y:2012:i:2:p:213-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rptp20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.