IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v9y2017i4p358-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pain perception in people diagnosed with schizophrenia: where we are and where we are going

Author

Listed:
  • O. Sakson-Obada

Abstract

The relationship between schizophrenia and diminished perception of pain has generally been confirmed in empirical studies, but the underlying mechanism is rarely addressed by researchers. This paper, based on the systematic review method, relates the study results to the theory of pain processing in order to improve our understanding of this phenomenon. An attempt is made to provide answers to two fundamental questions, namely: (1) Are the diminished pain thresholds independent of the type of stimulation applied? (2) What is the mechanism behind the disturbances in pain processing in people diagnosed with schizophrenia? The main conclusions are that: (1) schizophrenia is associated with pain insensitivity only when subjective pain assessment is applied; (2) the physiological and basic affective responses to pain are intact, but the complex psychological elaboration seems to be impaired; and additionally (3) theses regarding global pain threshold elevation should be formulated with caution, because the majority of studies employ only electrical or thermal stimulation. Moreover, a hypothesis concerning the lack of pain appreciation resulting from disturbances within the Body–Self is developed to explain the impairment of pain processing in the sensory-discriminative, affective, and cognitive dimensions. Suggestions for future research directions are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • O. Sakson-Obada, 2017. "Pain perception in people diagnosed with schizophrenia: where we are and where we are going," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 358-366, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:358-366
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2017.1344294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2017.1344294
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2017.1344294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:358-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.