IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v9y2017i4p310-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The long-term use of psychiatric services within the Open Dialogue treatment system after first-episode psychosis

Author

Listed:
  • Tomi Bergström
  • Birgitta Alakare
  • Jukka Aaltonen
  • Pirjo Mäki
  • Päivi Köngäs-Saviaro
  • Jyri J. Taskila
  • Jaakko Seikkula

Abstract

Open Dialogue is a family-oriented early intervention model for mental health problems developed in the health district of Western Lapland, Finland. In the present study, the aim was to describe how psychiatric services were used in Western Lapland after decades of first-episode psychosis services, and to analyze how baseline characteristics were related to re-admission rates and the total duration of psychiatric treatment in geographical area where Open Dialogue approaches were developed and efforts made to systematically apply them to all psychiatric treatments. The data were obtained from the medical histories of patients who had first-episode psychosis in 1992–2005 and who lived continuously within the catchment area during the observation years (1992–2015) (N = 65). From baseline up to 2015, average length of treatment was 6 ± 2 years, and significant decrease (p < .001) in total use of psychiatric services was observed. The admission rates and duration of treatment were highest with subjects who behaved aggressively (U = 270, p < .005), and/or who were hospitalized (U = 157, p < .001) and medicated (U = 114, p < .001) at onset. Overall, external aggression at onset emerges as a factor that may challenge the application of the OD treatment principles, being associated with a greater need for hospitalization and longer treatment duration.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomi Bergström & Birgitta Alakare & Jukka Aaltonen & Pirjo Mäki & Päivi Köngäs-Saviaro & Jyri J. Taskila & Jaakko Seikkula, 2017. "The long-term use of psychiatric services within the Open Dialogue treatment system after first-episode psychosis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 310-321, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:310-321
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2017.1344295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2017.1344295
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2017.1344295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:310-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.