IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v9y2017i2p157-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The importance of human relationships, ethics and recovery-orientated values in the delivery of CBT for people with psychosis

Author

Listed:
  • Alison Brabban
  • Rory Byrne
  • Eleanor Longden
  • Anthony P. Morrison

Abstract

Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is, at times, perceived as a technical therapy that undervalues the importance of human relationships and the fundamental principles on which CBTp itself is based (such as collaboration, validation, optimism and recovery-orientated practice). As such, it can be dismissed by service users or practitioners as undesirable. It is also possible that delivering CBTp that does not adhere to these values can be unhelpful or harmful. We review the evidence regarding what service users want from mental health services and the ability of CBTp to meet these standards. Evidence from qualitative studies and randomised controlled trials suggests that CBTp should be delivered in a manner that is both acceptable to, and empowering of, service users. We suggest strategies that are likely to maximise the likelihood of successful implementation that is consistent with both values base and evidence base.

Suggested Citation

  • Alison Brabban & Rory Byrne & Eleanor Longden & Anthony P. Morrison, 2017. "The importance of human relationships, ethics and recovery-orientated values in the delivery of CBT for people with psychosis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 157-166, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:157-166
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2016.1259648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2016.1259648
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2016.1259648?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:157-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.