IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v9y2017i1p67-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological interventions for trauma in individuals who have psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline Sin
  • Debbie Spain

Abstract

Background: Psychological interventions, in particular those derived from cognitive-behavioural therapy frameworks, and eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing, are effective for reducing post-traumatic stress disorder and associated distress. To date, studies have tended to exclude individuals who have psychosis; a clinical population who are known to be at risk of experiencing trauma. Whether people with psychosis also benefit from trauma-focussed psychological therapies (TFPT) warrants further investigation.Method: A systematic search for randomised controlled trials was undertaken. Data were synthesised using narrative and meta-analytic approaches.Results: Five studies met the review inclusion criteria. Study findings overall indicate that TFPT are effective for reducing intrusive thoughts and images, negative beliefs associated with traumatic memories, hypervigilance, and avoidance. Limited data were available about the utility of interventions for improving mood, anxiety and quality of life. Attrition rates were comparable for participants offered active and control conditions.Conclusion: Findings are consistent with those reported for the non-psychosis population. Future studies should establish which interventions are more acceptable and glean more favourable outcomes for this clinical population.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline Sin & Debbie Spain, 2017. "Psychological interventions for trauma in individuals who have psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 67-81, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:67-81
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2016.1167946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2016.1167946
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2016.1167946?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:67-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.