IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v9y2017i1p57-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do peer-support groups for voice-hearers work? A small scale study of Hearing Voices Network support groups in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa Beavan
  • Adele de Jager
  • Bianca dos Santos

Abstract

Hearing Voices Network (HVN) support groups have proliferated in the last decade, with anecdotal evidence suggesting they contribute significantly to the recovery trajectory of the voice-hearer members who attend them. However, to date there remains little empirical research into the efficacy of these groups and the processes that might underpin their efficacy. This article describes a small project evaluating the HVN groups in the large Australian state of New South Wales. Twenty-nine group members completed questionnaires exploring self-reported recovery-related and clinical outcomes, aspects of group process, and the extent to which core HVN principles were promoted within the group. Results indicate that HVN groups are associated with reported improvements across a number of recovery-related outcomes including feeling less isolated and more skilled in being with others, having improved self-esteem, and having a better understanding of their voice experiences. Positive changes were also noted in outcomes that are more traditionally associated with clinical improvements, such as decreased need for emergency help and medication, and increased hope in personal recovery. Although this study is small and based on self-report, the findings are promising and contribute to the small but growing literature on peer-supported interventions for psychosis and psychotic-like experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa Beavan & Adele de Jager & Bianca dos Santos, 2017. "Do peer-support groups for voice-hearers work? A small scale study of Hearing Voices Network support groups in Australia," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 57-66, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:57-66
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2016.1216583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2016.1216583
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2016.1216583?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:57-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.