IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v9y2017i1p48-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Childhood trauma in schizophrenia spectrum disorder as compared to other mental health disorders

Author

Listed:
  • N. Mørkved
  • M. Endsjø
  • D. Winje
  • E. Johnsen
  • A. Dovran
  • K. Arefjord
  • R. A. Kroken
  • S. Helle
  • L. G. Anda-Ågotnes
  • M. A. Rettenbacher
  • N. Huber
  • E. M. Løberg

Abstract

Background: Childhood trauma (CT) is a potential risk factor in psychosis, and the prevalence of CT may be higher in patients with psychosis compared to other mental health disorders. The aim of the study was to investigate the potential specificity of CT in psychosis.Methods: The sample consisted of 52 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and 52 matched patients with other mental health disorders. CT was measured by the CTQ-SF. The groups were compared on CTQ-SF sum and subscale scores indicating rates of CT, in addition to rates of none/low vs. moderate/severe levels of CT.Results: The psychosis group had significantly higher CTQ-SF sum scores, and reported significantly higher levels of, and more severe, physical and sexual abuse and physical neglect. Also, 67.3% of the psychosis group reported ≥ 1 CT above the cut-off, compared to 38.5% in the non-psychosis group. No patients in the non-psychosis group reported ≥ 4 CT, compared to 9.6% in the psychosis group.Conclusions: Patients with psychosis reported more severe and frequent CT compared to non-psychotic patients. Our results may indicate some specificity for moderate and severe levels of physical and sexual abuse, and physical neglect, in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Mørkved & M. Endsjø & D. Winje & E. Johnsen & A. Dovran & K. Arefjord & R. A. Kroken & S. Helle & L. G. Anda-Ågotnes & M. A. Rettenbacher & N. Huber & E. M. Løberg, 2017. "Childhood trauma in schizophrenia spectrum disorder as compared to other mental health disorders," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 48-56, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:48-56
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2016.1201135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2016.1201135
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2016.1201135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:48-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.