IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v8y2016i3p260-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Difficulties in diagnosing psychotic patients with traumatic experiences. Why don’t we hear what our patients say?

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Prot-Klinger

Abstract

The relationship between traumatic experience and psychosis is exemplified in this paper by two cases. The first patient was described by Maurycy Bornstein in 1916. The other is a Holocaust survivor currently provided psychotherapy by the author. Both cases demonstrate that trauma may underpin psychotic disorders and that the contents of psychotic symptoms may closely relate to traumatic experiences. Interpretation of symptom contents depends largely on the therapist’s ability to recognize trauma cues in the material provided by the patient. The Bornstein case shows how difficult it can be for us therapists to hear contents that relate to our repressed fears since such cues undermine our sense of security and comprehensibility of the surrounding world. The other case evidences the constant presence of the “Shoah complex” involving guilt feelings, and also the resulting difficulties in thinking and talking about the Holocaust in the community of therapists in Poland. The essential component of any therapy for people with psychotic symptoms and a history of trauma consists in helping them to connect these events and contain feelings of fear, shame and guilt.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Prot-Klinger, 2016. "Difficulties in diagnosing psychotic patients with traumatic experiences. Why don’t we hear what our patients say?," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 260-269, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:260-269
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2015.1131325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2015.1131325
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2015.1131325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:260-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.