IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v8y2016i3p238-249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining service user experiences of a Cognitive Therapy intervention for self-stigma in psychosis

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Wood
  • Eilish M. Burke
  • Rory Byrne
  • Anthony Morrison

Abstract

The internalisation of stigma is a common difficulty for people who experience psychosis. A small evidence base of conflicting findings has emerged for psychological interventions, including Cognitive Therapy (CT), in alleviating self-stigma. The aim of this study was to examine the experiences of service users who had undertaken a CT intervention targeting self-stigma in psychosis. Eight service users with experiences of psychosis took part in this study. They had all undertaken an individual CT intervention for self-stigma as part of a pilot randomised controlled trial. A semi-structured interview was conducted examining their subjective experiences of the intervention. Data were analysed using thematic analysis methodology. The analysis identified three distinct themes: what helped, what hindered and what came of it. What helped incorporated the beneficial change mechanisms of the CT intervention; what hindered identified specific challenges of the intervention; and what came of it described the consequences and outcomes of receiving the intervention. Overall, CT for self-stigma was found to be valuable by the majority of participants. The therapeutic relationship, psychoeducation, and normalisation were identified as the most important factors of therapy.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Wood & Eilish M. Burke & Rory Byrne & Anthony Morrison, 2016. "Examining service user experiences of a Cognitive Therapy intervention for self-stigma in psychosis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 238-249, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:238-249
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2015.1135184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2015.1135184
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2015.1135184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:238-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.