IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v8y2016i3p191-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond the sensory: Findings from an in-depth analysis of the phenomenology of “auditory hallucinations” in schizophrenia

Author

Listed:
  • Nev Jones
  • Tanya Marie Luhrmann

Abstract

Objective: Research concerning the subjective sensory qualities of auditory hallucinations (AH) in people diagnosed with schizophrenia is scarce. Our goal was to investigate the “auditoriness” of AH and their overlap with symptoms grounded in alterations of thought rather than perception.Method: We undertook a detailed analysis of phenomenological interviews with 80 schizophrenia-spectrum voice-hearers.Results: We coded the dominant voice patterns of our subjects and found that only a minority (17.5%) reported a dominant pattern of AH which were experienced as literally auditory. Of dominant AH patterns, 11.3% were instead described as only quasi- or partially auditory, 28.8% as involving a combination of distinctly auditory and thought-like voices, and 15% as unambiguously thought-like. In addition, 5% reported exclusively simple, short-duration AH (e.g. hearing a single word), 12.5% the misperception of actual speech or sounds, and 10% predominantly multisensory voices. We also found substantial overlap between voices and symptoms traditionally considered abnormalities of thought rather than sensation.Conclusion: We believe these findings challenge common assumptions about AH in people diagnosed with schizophrenia, draw attention to potentially important but under-recognized characteristics of voices, and suggest a need for greater recognition of the heterogeneity of voices and the potential clinical as well as theoretical risks of conceptual over-simplification.

Suggested Citation

  • Nev Jones & Tanya Marie Luhrmann, 2016. "Beyond the sensory: Findings from an in-depth analysis of the phenomenology of “auditory hallucinations” in schizophrenia," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 191-202, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:191-202
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2015.1100670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2015.1100670
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2015.1100670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:191-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.