IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v7y2015i4p302-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation-based training for “front-of-house” staff in psychosis services

Author

Listed:
  • David Baumeister
  • Elaine Gill
  • Bernadette O’Neill
  • Rachel Perera
  • Suzanne Jolley

Abstract

Staff communication skills are key to improving patients’ experience of healthcare, from the point of first contact with services to treatment end. To date, training initiatives to improve communication have prioritised the clinical workforce, rather than allied and support staff. In this study we evaluated the impact of simulation-based communication training for “front-of-house” staff (receptionists and administrators) working in specialist psychosis services. Forty-three staff completed the two-day training. Before and after training, staff rated the importance of communication skills in their role (Attitude), their understanding of psychosis (Knowledge), and their workplace satisfaction (Satisfaction). Attendees repeated the measures at follow-up (6–12 months post-training; n = 11), alongside a behavioural communication skills task, and were compared to a group of non-attenders (n = 12). Pre–post improvements were evident on all measures, reaching significance for Knowledge (medium effect). Improvements were mostly maintained in the 26% of attendees completing follow-up assessments. At follow-up, attendees scored significantly higher than non-attenders on Attitude and Knowledge (large effects), marginally higher on skills, but lower on Satisfaction. The workshops improved staff understanding of psychosis and the importance of communication in their roles. The impact of the training on service users’ satisfaction with services should now be evaluated in a controlled trial.

Suggested Citation

  • David Baumeister & Elaine Gill & Bernadette O’Neill & Rachel Perera & Suzanne Jolley, 2015. "Simulation-based training for “front-of-house” staff in psychosis services," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 302-311, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:302-311
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2015.1020334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2015.1020334
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2015.1020334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:302-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.