IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v5y2013i2p144-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychiatric diagnosis: what the recovery movement can offer the DSM-5 revision process

Author

Listed:
  • Yaara Zisman-Ilani
  • David Roe
  • Elizabeth Flanagan
  • Abraham Rudnick
  • Larry Davidson

Abstract

Many developments in the understanding of mental disorders are reflected in the ways in which the DSM has evolved through its different editions over the years. Within the context of the upcoming publishing of the DSM-5, and particularly in relation to people diagnosed with schizophrenia and psychosis, the purposes of the present paper are to: (a) briefly review the central developments of the DSM over time; (b) challenge the current role of the DSM as a classification manual in light of recent developments in psychiatric rehabilitation; (c) discuss the role of personal experience and subjectivity in the diagnostic process; and (d) offer suggestions as to how the DSM-5 can benefit from the recent tenets and findings of psychiatric rehabilitation. We claim that developments in the field of psychiatric rehabilitation, and its vision of recovery, do not yet find expression in the current DSM edition. We believe that it is important to update future versions of the manual with the findings and developments which have occurred in this field over the last several decades in order to improve diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes in mental health.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaara Zisman-Ilani & David Roe & Elizabeth Flanagan & Abraham Rudnick & Larry Davidson, 2013. "Psychiatric diagnosis: what the recovery movement can offer the DSM-5 revision process," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 144-153.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:144-153
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2012.699542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2012.699542
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2012.699542?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:144-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.