IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v5y2013i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is psychosis? A meta-synthesis of inductive qualitative studies exploring the experience of psychosis

Author

Listed:
  • Simon McCarthy-Jones
  • Michael Marriott
  • Rebecca Knowles
  • Georgina Rowse
  • Andrew Thompson

Abstract

Qualitative studies have played an important role in elucidating the lived experience of psychosis and there has recently been an increase in the number of such studies. There is now an urgent need to draw together the findings of these studies. This paper performed a meta-synthesis of inductive qualitative peer-reviewed research into psychosis. Ninety-seven articles were identified for systematic appraisal. Four themes, “Losing,” “Identifying a need for, and seeking, help,” “Rebuilding and reforging,” and “Better than new: gifts from psychosis,” were identified. Central to the first and third themes were the loss and regaining of basic human needs such as sleep, physical and financial security, relationships with friends and family, self-esteem, and hope. The important implications of the four themes for clinical practice, and for future research are examined, and it is demonstrated how the experience of psychosis is much more than simply just hallucinations and/or delusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon McCarthy-Jones & Michael Marriott & Rebecca Knowles & Georgina Rowse & Andrew Thompson, 2013. "What is psychosis? A meta-synthesis of inductive qualitative studies exploring the experience of psychosis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2011.647051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2011.647051
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2011.647051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.