IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v4y2012i2p149-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fear of annihilation in subjects at risk of psychosis: A pilot study

Author

Listed:
  • Kirstine Davidsen
  • Bent Rosenbaum

Abstract

Most reports on people at risk of psychosis focus on differences in baseline measures between those who go on to develop psychosis and those who remain non-psychotic. Due to the clinical status of subjects in these studies, the aim of the present study is to illuminate clinically important and under-researched characteristics of the group of subjects at risk of psychosis as a whole. This article reports on a cross-sectional study, comparing the level of annihilation anxiety in subjects at risk of psychosis with two control groups: healthy controls and schizophrenia patients. The level of annihilation anxiety is assessed with the Hurvich Experience Inventory-50. The study shows that subjects at risk of psychosis experience annihilation anxiety significantly more than do healthy controls, and at least as much as psychotic patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. This signals the need for immediate clinical intervention in this population. The high level of annihilation anxiety is likely to interfere with the working alliance, thus clinicians should provide an ambience of safety and transparency. In addition, interventions for subjects at risk of psychosis should aim to reduce the level of anxiety, e.g. through psychotherapy. The study warrants further investigations of clinically important characteristics of the group of subjects at risk of psychosis as a whole Most reports on people at risk of psychosis focus on differences in baseline measures between those who go on to develop psychosis and those who remain non-psychotic. Due to the clinical status of subjects in these studies, the aim of the present study is to illuminate clinically important and under-researched characteristics of the group of subjects at risk of psychosis as a whole. This article reports on a cross-sectional study, comparing the level of annihilation anxiety in subjects at risk of psychosis with two control groups: healthy controls and schizophrenia patients. The level of annihilation anxiety is assessed with the Hurvich Experience Inventory-50. The study shows that subjects at risk of psychosis experience annihilation anxiety significantly more than do healthy controls, and at least as much as psychotic patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. This signals the need for immediate clinical intervention in this population. The high level of annihilation anxiety is likely to interfere with the working alliance, thus clinicians should provide an ambience of safety and transparency. In addition, interventions for subjects at risk of psychosis should aim to reduce the level of anxiety, e.g. through psychotherapy. The study warrants further investigations of clinically important characteristics of the group of subjects at risk of psychosis as a whole

Suggested Citation

  • Kirstine Davidsen & Bent Rosenbaum, 2012. "Fear of annihilation in subjects at risk of psychosis: A pilot study," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 149-160.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:149-160
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2011.588339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2011.588339
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2011.588339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:149-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.