IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v4y2012i2p105-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence-based hope for recovery from “schizophrenia”: A common objective for all stakeholders in the mental health field

Author

Listed:
  • G. Tibaldi
  • L. Govers

Abstract

This article summarizes the research about, and presents a personal account of, recovery from “schizophrenia”.In a potentially optimistic mental health scenario, like that in Italy, where psychiatric hospitals were closed and community-oriented care is nearly ubiquitous, the majority of mental health professionals maintain a pessimistic outlook concerning the long-term outcomes of schizophrenia. This gap between a clinician’s daily practice and prognostic beliefs about schizophrenia has a considerable effect on the expectations of patients and their families, and is the underlying theme of this article.Hope can be considered reasonable on two conditions: that it is not taken for granted and that it is supported by convincing data. The available scientific evidence on favourable outcomes of schizophrenia is consistent and convincing. The “positive” personal accounts of recovery, which have been accumulating over the last few decades, represent another relevant source of evidence.The “evidence-based” hope of recovery from schizophrenia is a reasonable one, both now and in the near future. It represents a common horizon for people who experience psychotic episodes, for their families and for all healthcare professionals who support abilities rather than disabilities. This article summarizes the research about, and presents a personal account of, recovery from “schizophrenia”.In a potentially optimistic mental health scenario, like that in Italy, where psychiatric hospitals were closed and community-oriented care is nearly ubiquitous, the majority of mental health professionals maintain a pessimistic outlook concerning the long-term outcomes of schizophrenia. This gap between a clinician’s daily practice and prognostic beliefs about schizophrenia has a considerable effect on the expectations of patients and their families, and is the underlying theme of this article.Hope can be considered reasonable on two conditions: that it is not taken for granted and that it is supported by convincing data. The available scientific evidence on favourable outcomes of schizophrenia is consistent and convincing. The “positive” personal accounts of recovery, which have been accumulating over the last few decades, represent another relevant source of evidence.The “evidence-based” hope of recovery from schizophrenia is a reasonable one, both now and in the near future. It represents a common horizon for people who experience psychotic episodes, for their families and for all healthcare professionals who support abilities rather than disabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Tibaldi & L. Govers, 2012. "Evidence-based hope for recovery from “schizophrenia”: A common objective for all stakeholders in the mental health field," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 105-114.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:105-114
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2011.584349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2011.584349
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2011.584349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:105-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.