Author
Listed:
- Maria Fontao
- Klaus Hoffmann
Abstract
Psychosocial treatment in group format with people diagnosed with schizophrenia has been applied for decades. Meta-analyses and reviews support the clinical impression that psychosocial treatment in group format is effective. The most investigated forms of group treatment are social skills groups, psycho-educational groups with patients and families, and cognitive-behavioural therapy. Psychodynamic approaches and traditional verbal therapies in group settings are frequently applied but have not been sufficiently investigated to date. In this article, the main results of outcome research on psychosocial treatment in group format with people diagnosed with schizophrenia are summarized and critically discussed with respect to methodological shortcomings. The need for more research on psychodynamic approaches and group processes is also emphasized. Psychosocial treatment in group format with people diagnosed with schizophrenia has been applied for decades. Meta-analyses and reviews support the clinical impression that psychosocial treatment in group format is effective. The most investigated forms of group treatment are social skills groups, psycho-educational groups with patients and families, and cognitive-behavioural therapy. Psychodynamic approaches and traditional verbal therapies in group settings are frequently applied but have not been sufficiently investigated to date. In this article, the main results of outcome research on psychosocial treatment in group format with people diagnosed with schizophrenia are summarized and critically discussed with respect to methodological shortcomings. The need for more research on psychodynamic approaches and group processes is also emphasized.
Suggested Citation
Maria Fontao & Klaus Hoffmann, 2011.
"Psychosocial treatment in group format with people diagnosed with schizophrenia: results and limitations of empirical research,"
Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 226-234.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:3:y:2011:i:3:p:226-234
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2010.548100
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:3:y:2011:i:3:p:226-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.