Author
Listed:
- Peter Phalen
- Alicia Lucksted
- Kenzie Fox
- Akram Yusuf
- Jesse Hochheiser
- Nev Jones
- Anastasia Fetisova
- Ann Hackman
- Melanie Bennett
Abstract
Background: We conducted a community clinician training in DBT (n = 19) and a subsequent pilot DBT skills group (n = 7) to assess preliminary feasibility and acceptability of DBT for people with psychotic diagnoses and high risk of suicide, in anticipation of a pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).Methods: For the clinician training we monitored attendance, satisfaction, and the proportion of clinicians who volunteered to be study clinicians. For the DBT pilot group, we collected data on acceptability, feasibility, satisfaction, preliminary quantitative outcomes, and posttreatment qualitative interviews.Results: There was strong interest in DBT from community clinicians, with 95% of training participants indicating a desire to serve as volunteer study therapists. There was strong patient satisfaction with the DBT skills group, and improvements on measures of emotion dysregulation, depression, and suicidality. Patients described the group as causing improved emotional well-being, better interpersonal relationships, and reduced suicidality, and appreciated the group atmosphere and interactions with other group members.Discussion: This pilot study suggested an encouraging outlook on DBT for people with psychosis and high risk of suicide, and there appeared to be strong stakeholder interest.
Suggested Citation
Peter Phalen & Alicia Lucksted & Kenzie Fox & Akram Yusuf & Jesse Hochheiser & Nev Jones & Anastasia Fetisova & Ann Hackman & Melanie Bennett, 2026.
"Pilot of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) skills training for people with psychosis spectrum conditions and high risk of suicide,"
Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 180-196, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:180-196
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2025.2570374
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:18:y:2026:i:2:p:180-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.