Author
Listed:
- David Ariel Sher
- Shioma-Lei Craythorne
- Thomas Kabir
- Daniel Freeman
- Felicity Waite
Abstract
BackgroundPatient perspectives on recovery from psychosis have been studied. However, there are few studies on recovery from particular psychotic experiences. Persecutory delusions are common, often distressing, and can disrupt day-to-day life and relationships. We explored how patients report recovering from persecutory delusions.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were completed with 15 patients who had recovered from persecutory delusions. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was used.ResultsThree superordinate themes were identified. The first was “Foundational background features set the context for recovery”. A range of features, including support and respect from others, routine, calm environments, and medication, provided the basis for recovery. The second superordinate theme was “Activity as a route for positivity and re-engagement with the world”. Engagement in activity was important to re-orient attention away from paranoid fears, and to improve mood. The third superordinate theme was “The effortful discovery of safety”. Generating, considering, and testing alternative explanations was a key route to learning safety.DiscussionRecovery from persecutory delusions can take many routes, which vary between individuals. Supporting individuals to reengage with activity and generate acceptable and sufficiently-evidenced alternatives to paranoid fears are potentially valuable treatment targets in the processes of recovery from paranoia.
Suggested Citation
David Ariel Sher & Shioma-Lei Craythorne & Thomas Kabir & Daniel Freeman & Felicity Waite, 2025.
"How do people recover from persecutory delusions? An interpretative phenomenological analysis,"
Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 404-419, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:404-419
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2025.2516469
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:404-419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.