IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v17y2025i3p264-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Am I dependent on a lifetime use of antipsychotics? A qualitative analysis of Q&A data about stopping and tapering antipsychotics from the perspective of users and their relatives

Author

Listed:
  • S. Crutzen
  • J. van Os
  • S. Castelein

Abstract

BackgroundMany antipsychotic users at some point want to stop their antipsychotic. They mention side effects, functioning, experiencing no benefits and health concerns as motivations. The aim was to explore questions antipsychotic users and their relatives have about stopping or tapering antipsychotics.MethodsData were used from a publicly available anonymous expert Q&A in which experts answered questions about mental health. Questions about stopping or tapering antipsychotics asked by antipsychotics users and their relatives were analysed using an inductive content analysis.ResultsA total of 3000 questions were screened, where 426 were about antipsychotics and 194 were about stopping or tapering antipsychotics. The most common question was whether it was sensible to stop. Questions focused on how fast to taper, what their minimum dose should be, where to find support and when withdrawal symptoms or side effects would subside. Motivations were side effects, difficulties in functioning and experiencing no benefits. Barriers were lack of support and return of symptoms. Facilitators were support and experiencing a relief from side effects and/or symptoms.DiscussionAntipsychotic users and their relatives are left with many questions about tapering antipsychotics. These questions reveal attitudes, preferences and concerns that are important to address when discussing antipsychotic treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Crutzen & J. van Os & S. Castelein, 2025. "Am I dependent on a lifetime use of antipsychotics? A qualitative analysis of Q&A data about stopping and tapering antipsychotics from the perspective of users and their relatives," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 264-275, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:264-275
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2024.2430466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2024.2430466
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2024.2430466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:264-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.