IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v17y2025i2p125-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feeling heard: an uncontrolled feasibility study evaluating a novel intervention pathway for psychosis patients distressed by hearing voices

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Hayward
  • Hazel Ashment
  • Hazel Frost
  • Rosalind Byles
  • Evelin Vogel
  • Lucy Walsh
  • David Fowler
  • Sofia Loizou
  • Clara Strauss

Abstract

BackgroundCognitive Behaviour Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) has been the psychological intervention recommended for the treatment of psychosis for the past two decades. However, benefits from and access to CBTp are limited. Responses to these issues have included the targeting of CBTp at single symptoms and the delivery of CBT-informed interventions by briefly trained therapists. We sought to combine these approaches by drawing upon a wider workforce of therapists to deliver a pathway of interventions for distressing voices.MethodsThis study was an uncontrolled feasibility study evaluating a pathway of CBT-informed interventions offered over a maximum of 20 sessions. The evaluation of outcomes focused on recruitment, retention, potential for effectiveness and safety.ResultsOf the 14 consenting participants, 11 completed the intervention pathway. There was a large, significant pre-post reduction in voice related distress for the per-protocol sample (Cohen’s d = 1.51 [95% CI: 0.61 to 2.37]. No serious adverse events related to the intervention pathway occurred.ConclusionIt is feasible to conduct an evaluation of the Feeling Heard intervention pathway. Randomised Controlled Trials are required to robustly assess its efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Hayward & Hazel Ashment & Hazel Frost & Rosalind Byles & Evelin Vogel & Lucy Walsh & David Fowler & Sofia Loizou & Clara Strauss, 2025. "Feeling heard: an uncontrolled feasibility study evaluating a novel intervention pathway for psychosis patients distressed by hearing voices," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 125-136, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:125-136
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2024.2351817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2024.2351817
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2024.2351817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:125-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.