IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v16y2024i1p28-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The experience of community mental health teams by people with long-term experience of psychosis

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy Carter
  • Tom Isherwood
  • Anjula Gupta

Abstract

BACKGROUNDThe recovery movement has facilitated a move from a palliative approach to care, to one that emphasises the possibility and likelihood of recovery. This study aimed to explore people’s experience of community mental health services, and to explore any changes that have occurred over-time.METHODA qualitative study was conducted using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Seven individuals who have experience of psychosis and who have been involved with services for 5 years or more, were recruited from community mental health teams in the UK. Interviews were conducted via the telephone using a semi-structured approach.RESULTSIndividuals reported a mixed experience of services. Four super-ordinate themes were identified; 1) Grateful for connection; 2) Hesitant about being dissatisfied; 3) The unequal distribution of power; and 4) An enduring vulnerability.DISCUSSIONService-users benefited from a secure and connected relationship with professionals. They were less comfortable about criticising services but did describe some elements of care that were oppressive and isolating. Furthermore, the balance of power continues to favour professionals, with a more equal relationship required if we are to facilitate recovery and empower service-users.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy Carter & Tom Isherwood & Anjula Gupta, 2024. "The experience of community mental health teams by people with long-term experience of psychosis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 28-39, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:28-39
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2022.2116474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2022.2116474
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2022.2116474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:28-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.