IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v16y2024i1p15-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“I found hundreds of other people…but I still wasn’t believed” – An exploratory study on lived experiences of antipsychotic withdrawal

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Rhiannon King
  • Mark Allan
  • Laura Lindsey

Abstract

BackgroundAntipsychotic withdrawal refers to a diverse range of symptoms and experiences, which can occur secondary to the cessation or reduction in dose of an antipsychotic drug. This study addresses the shortage of qualitative research that investigates users’ hopes, expectations, and feelings throughout the process, as well as limited research on people prescribed antipsychotics for off-license indications.MethodsNine people recruited from online user-led groups and forums relevant to antipsychotic withdrawal took part in semi-structured interviews via online video. Four of the participants were prescribed antipsychotics for off-licence indications. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify themes.ResultsThe themes were: balancing priorities, withdrawal journey, invalidation of experiences and peer community. Findings show the extent of symptoms that can be experienced secondary to antipsychotic discontinuation, they highlight the wider individual context that antipsychotics impact, and the meaningful reasoning behind withdrawal decisions.DiscussionThis study highlights the importance of developing clinical guidelines for antipsychotic withdrawal to facilitate service-user choice and minimize harms when making decisions about discontinuation. These findings endorse a shift towards full disclosure on the risk of antipsychotic withdrawal effects at the point of starting antipsychotics thus allowing service-users to make informed choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Rhiannon King & Mark Allan & Laura Lindsey, 2024. "“I found hundreds of other people…but I still wasn’t believed” – An exploratory study on lived experiences of antipsychotic withdrawal," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 15-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:15-27
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2022.2141841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2022.2141841
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2022.2141841?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:15-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.