IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v15y2023i3p219-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medication resistant psychosis: how many CBT sessions might be needed for recovery? A case report with psychodynamic commentary

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Reiser
  • Douglas Turkington
  • Michael Garrett

Abstract

BackgroundWhen clinicians adopt the standard 16–26 session maximum suggested by CBTp efficacy research, clients with long-term medication resistant psychosis may receive an inadequate dose of therapy. Building engagement and trust can take significantly longer for clients who have been given a stigmatizing medical explanation for their difficulties.MethodsWe present a case study of successful long-term CBTp consisting of 200 sessions over a 6-year period. Supervision aided the recovery process over the last 2 years of therapy.ResultsA client with a 30-year history of medication resistant persecutory delusions, voices, stigma and prominent negative symptoms gradually formed a working alliance with the therapist. A CBT formulation emphasizing activating the adaptive mode led to later targeted work to reduce distress and social avoidance and address underlying trauma. Social recovery was achieved with increased independence and enhanced creativity. A commentary is provided by a senior clinician from a psychodynamic perspective.DiscussionClients with long-term medication resistant psychosis often need an increased number of CBT sessions but can still recover. Ongoing supportive supervision prevents early discharge and a failure to achieve a recovery trajectory. We should not accept that medication resistant clients are CBT resistant following a brief course of therapy.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Reiser & Douglas Turkington & Michael Garrett, 2023. "Medication resistant psychosis: how many CBT sessions might be needed for recovery? A case report with psychodynamic commentary," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 219-228, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:219-228
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2022.2038255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2022.2038255
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2022.2038255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:219-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.