IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v15y2023i2p201-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Service User Perceived Criticism and Warmth (SU-PCaW) Questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Izon
  • Karmen Au-Yeung
  • Katherine Berry
  • Paul French

Abstract

BackgroundThe outcomes for a wide range of physical and mental health conditions can be influenced by the level of criticism and warmth in the family environment known in the literature as Expressed Emotion (EE). This finding is also true for individuals with an At-Risk Mental State (ARMS) for psychosis with individual’s perceptions of EE predicting transition to psychosis. While the original concept of EE incorporates both positive and negative aspects of relationships, most measures of EE and research focus on the negative aspects of relationships. Positive factors are also important and associated with improvements in functioning and reduced symptoms. However, the absence of a comprehensive, self-report measure of positive aspects of EE has hindered research in this area.MethodsThis study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of a new 10-item Service User Perceived Criticism and Warmth Questionnaire (SU-PCaW) based on the 2-item Perceived Criticism and 2-item Perceived Warmth questionnaires.ResultsThe measure was quick and easy to administer and had high internal consistency and reliability.ConclusionThis measure would aid services in screening families for therapy, be helpful in evaluating family intervention in groups such as the ARMS population and a useful measure for future research developments.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Izon & Karmen Au-Yeung & Katherine Berry & Paul French, 2023. "Service User Perceived Criticism and Warmth (SU-PCaW) Questionnaire," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 201-210, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:201-210
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2022.2038254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2022.2038254
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2022.2038254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:201-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.