IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v15y2023i1p66-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying victimisation profiles in people with psychosis and a history of childhood trauma: a latent class analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Georgina L Barnes
  • Richard Emsley
  • Philippa Garety
  • Amy Hardy

Abstract

BackgroundPeople with psychosis experience higher rates of childhood victimisation compared to the general population, which may impact on mental health and recovery. This study aimed to identify childhood victimisation profiles in a clinical sample to inform recommendations for routine care.MethodsParticipants were 146 adults (ages 19–65 years; M = 42.2) with schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses reporting trauma. Childhood trauma was assessed using two retrospective measures, and a latent class analysis (LCA) was performed on four trauma types (sexual abuse, emotional abuse, physical abuse and neglect). Multinomial logistic regression investigated demographic differences between the classes.ResultsFour distinct childhood trauma classes were identified: Emotional abuse/neglect (n = 29); physical abuse (n = 14); sexual abuse (n = 19); and poly-victimisation (n = 84). There were no differences between the classes in terms of age, ethnicity, relationship status, education or current employment (relative risk (RR) = 0.85–1.27, p > 0.05). Participants in the poly-victimisation class were significantly more likely to be female (RR = 0.22–0.28, p

Suggested Citation

  • Georgina L Barnes & Richard Emsley & Philippa Garety & Amy Hardy, 2023. "Identifying victimisation profiles in people with psychosis and a history of childhood trauma: a latent class analysis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 66-76, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:66-76
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2021.2009903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2021.2009903
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2021.2009903?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:66-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.