IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v14y2022i4p355-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A grounded theory analysis of care-coordinators’ perceptions of family growth associated with an experience of first episode psychosis

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Thornhill
  • Chris Sanderson
  • Anjula Gupta

Abstract

BackgroundGrowth associated with a first episode of psychosis (FEP) is taken from post-traumatic growth literature, where positive changes are perceived following adverse circumstances. FEP is a critical period in which care-coordinators play a key role in working with families. Care-coordinators’ perceptions influence the way in which they work with families.MethodsEleven care-coordinators described their perceptions of growth within families with FEP through semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed using social constructivist grounded theory.ResultsCare-coordinators perceived the existence of family growth in the form of enhanced communication, as well as less explicit forms of growth including distancing from unhelpful relationships and a re-establishment of norms and boundaries. Growth was inhibited by the construct of the “perfect family” model, a mis-trust in services due to suspiciousness or prior negative experiences of services.DiscussionThese inhibitors limit engagement with interventions and prevent open exploration of difficulties. Future work may consider how these findings align with the views of families.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Thornhill & Chris Sanderson & Anjula Gupta, 2022. "A grounded theory analysis of care-coordinators’ perceptions of family growth associated with an experience of first episode psychosis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 355-367, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:355-367
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2021.1971743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2021.1971743
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2021.1971743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:355-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.