IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v14y2022i3p237-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Basic demographic outcomes: additional findings of a single-blind, randomised, controlled trial on metacognitive training for psychosis

Author

Listed:
  • Zita Fekete
  • Edit Vass
  • Ramóna Balajthy
  • Ünige Tana
  • Attila Csaba Nagy
  • Barnabás Oláh
  • Ildikó Kuritárné Szabó

Abstract

BackgroundEvidence of the effect of metacognitive and social cognitive impairment on the symptoms and functioning of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia led to the development of the Metacognitive Training. We hypothesise that improvement in these cognitive functions leads to less severe symptoms and to better adaptation to real-life social situations, which would be reflected in aspects of the patients’ demographic status.MethodWe report the additional findings of a randomised, controlled, single-blind study with a six-month follow-up period. We provided 36 patients with training to improve their metacognition and social cognition. The control group received treatment as usual. Symptom severity, measured by the PANSS scale, and demographic data were assessed at baseline and six months after the training.ResultsCompared to the control group, the intervention group showed less severe symptoms, and achieved more progress in demographic status. These steps may be statistically non-significant; yet, may represent crucial changes in some patients’ lives.DiscussionMetacognitive Training is not only an appropriate method to decrease symptom severity, but the training of metacognitive and social cognitive functions can also contribute to a better adaptation to real-life.

Suggested Citation

  • Zita Fekete & Edit Vass & Ramóna Balajthy & Ünige Tana & Attila Csaba Nagy & Barnabás Oláh & Ildikó Kuritárné Szabó, 2022. "Basic demographic outcomes: additional findings of a single-blind, randomised, controlled trial on metacognitive training for psychosis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 237-247, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:237-247
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2021.1952296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2021.1952296
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2021.1952296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:237-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.