Author
Listed:
- Sam Bard
- Amy Degnan
- Katherine Berry
- Dawn Edge
Abstract
BackgroundBlack African and Caribbean people in the UK have the highest rates of diagnosis with Psychosis. Compared with other ethnic groups, their contact with mental health services is characterised by inferior access, care experiences, and outcomes. Previous research suggests that beliefs about mental health problems may influence emotional responses, coping behaviours and outcomes in psychosis.MethodThe study examined the causal attributions and illness perceptions of 51 Black African and Caribbean people with non-affective psychosis and their associations with psychosis symptoms, using the Positive and Negative Syndrome S and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire.ResultsBlack service users with non-affective psychosis most frequently attributed mental health problems to psychosocial factors, though spiritual, biological and substance abuse explanations were also provided. Endorsing a psychosocial explanation for psychosis was associated with less severe negative symptoms. More negative or threatening illness perceptions were correlated with greater negative, general and overall symptom severity in psychosis.ConclusionsPsychological formulations and interventions for Black people experiencing psychosis should consider personalised beliefs about their mental health problems as this may facilitate improvements in symptoms. Further longitudinal research is warranted in larger samples to examine psychological causal mechanisms linking illness beliefs and psychosis outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Sam Bard & Amy Degnan & Katherine Berry & Dawn Edge, 2021.
"Exploring the relationships between illness beliefs and psychosis symptoms among Black African and Caribbean people with non-affective psychosis,"
Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 265-275, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:265-275
DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2020.1856173
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:265-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.