IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v13y2021i1p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A five-year prospective evaluation of a new community psychosis service in North London: introducing the Recovery and Enablement Track (RET)

Author

Listed:
  • James Hurley
  • Suzanne Jolley
  • Orla Gibbons
  • Aduramigba Williams
  • Satish Nath Varma
  • Suchi Bhandari
  • Kajori Mukherjee
  • Hilary Garraway
  • Cerys Jones
  • Narin Aker
  • Elizabeth Appiah-Kusi
  • Timothy Weaver

Abstract

BackgroundUnited Kingdom mental healthcare guidelines recommend recovery-focused services for people with psychosis. We evaluated a “Recovery and Enablement Track” (RET) aiming to promote recovery and well-being, reduce distress and maintain independence from secondary care following discharge, for people with established psychosis and long histories of secondary care.MethodFrom March 2015 to December 2019, 214 individuals entered the RET and were followed up 12 months’ post-discharge. Recovery, well-being, and distress were measured at assessment, review, and discharge. Of 214 total people, 86 consented to inclusion for this evaluation.ResultsWell-being and recovery significantly improved from assessment to discharge – distress did not. Distress improved from review to discharge, suggesting improvement during service contact. 79% (68/86) of individuals were discharged to the care of their family doctor, and 22% of these (15/68) re-presented before 12-month follow-up.ConclusionRecovery and well-being improved from assessment to discharge, distress improved from review to discharge. Half of consenting participants were successfully discharged from secondary care following the RET, suggesting potential to promote recovery. Comparison to a formal control condition with systematic analysis of any biasing effect of missing data (i.e. through refusal to participate) is now indicated.

Suggested Citation

  • James Hurley & Suzanne Jolley & Orla Gibbons & Aduramigba Williams & Satish Nath Varma & Suchi Bhandari & Kajori Mukherjee & Hilary Garraway & Cerys Jones & Narin Aker & Elizabeth Appiah-Kusi & Timoth, 2021. "A five-year prospective evaluation of a new community psychosis service in North London: introducing the Recovery and Enablement Track (RET)," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2020.1803954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2020.1803954
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2020.1803954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.