IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v12y2020i3p245-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A grounded theory of how service users experience and make use of formulation in therapy for psychosis

Author

Listed:
  • Melanie Gibbs
  • Maria Griffiths
  • Sarah Dilks

Abstract

Objectives: This study set out to explore service user experiences of formulation during individual therapy for psychosis, and develop a grounded theory of the processes involved.Method: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 11 service users and two clinical psychologists with experience of formulation in therapy for psychosis.Design: Grounded theory was used to examine the qualitative data collected.Results: An emerging model was constructed to conceptualise the processes that occur during the sharing of a formulation. “Linking previous experiences with current ways of being” and “Building the therapeutic relationship” emerged as core, reciprocally influential processes. “Making use of new understandings” was also identified as an important process.Conclusions: The findings suggest that formulations should be developed collaboratively and progressively with service users, and that care should be given to the emotions that arise as a result. Further research is necessary to elaborate our understanding of formulation given the importance placed on it in United Kingdom clinical psychology.

Suggested Citation

  • Melanie Gibbs & Maria Griffiths & Sarah Dilks, 2020. "A grounded theory of how service users experience and make use of formulation in therapy for psychosis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 245-256, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:245-256
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2020.1742198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2020.1742198
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2020.1742198?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:245-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.