IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v12y2020i3p222-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of social networks in early psychosis

Author

Listed:
  • Marjolaine Masse
  • Karine Paquin
  • Paul Lysaker
  • Tania Lecomte

Abstract

Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia are consistently found to have smaller social networks, as well as deficits in metacognition; the results for those with comorbid substance misuse are contradictory. The role of metacognition in the development of social relationships in individuals with early psychosis and comorbid substance misuse is poorly understood and few studies have investigated its impact longitudinally.Method: A mixed method approach was used to analyze data from 10 verbatims from semi-structured, retrospective longitudinal interviews, and metacognition ratings.Results: Distinct profiles were identified and appeared stable over time in their reactions to life transition. Profile 1 presented with overall better metacognitive abilities, and varied on the onset, conclusion and diversity of relationships. Profile 2 showed poorer abilities, and completely changed social networks at transitions. The presence of mutually supportive relationships and of personal interest contributing to friendship formation differentiated profiles.Conclusion: Two profiles emerged: distinct in their stability and quality of friendships, as well as in their metacognitive abilities and substance use friendships. Interests, and intensity of the interpersonal connection also distinguished both profiles.

Suggested Citation

  • Marjolaine Masse & Karine Paquin & Paul Lysaker & Tania Lecomte, 2020. "Evolution of social networks in early psychosis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 222-233, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:222-233
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2020.1736611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2020.1736611
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2020.1736611?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:222-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.