IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v12y2020i2p151-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delusion formation as an inevitable consequence of a radical alteration in lived experience

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Gunn
  • Michael Larkin

Abstract

The definition of delusion is usually couched in terms of false beliefs held with conviction despite evidence to the contrary. Such beliefs are usually seen as impossible or implausible by others. In order to be classed as clinically significant, a delusion would lead a person to be distressed or to have significant problems with functioning. We note that a person ordinarily understands and negotiates the world based on familiar patterns derived from her cultural and historical experience. Thus, when her lived experience is altered, these assumptions about how the world works may be called in to question. Drawing on interviews conducted with people experiencing clinically significant delusions, we show how this alteration in lived experience manifests as emotional, affective and/or perceptual anomalies. We adopt the framework of the Enactive Approach which posits that a person interacts with her environment in terms of sense-making and we argue that radical alterations in lived experience can demand a renegotiating of how a person makes sense of this new world. We suggest that if the alteration in lived experience is sufficiently radical, then delusion formation is inevitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Gunn & Michael Larkin, 2020. "Delusion formation as an inevitable consequence of a radical alteration in lived experience," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 151-161, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:151-161
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2019.1690562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2019.1690562
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2019.1690562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:151-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.