IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v12y2020i2p106-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voice hearers’ experiences of the Making Sense of Voices approach in an NHS setting

Author

Listed:
  • Craig Steel
  • Joachim Schnackenberg
  • Zoe Travers
  • Eleanor Longden
  • Emily Greenfield
  • Lynette Meredith
  • Hayley Perry
  • Dirk Corstens

Abstract

The ‘Making Sense of Voices’ (MsV), or ‘Maastricht’ approach has become established within large sections of the voice hearing community, as well as being adopted by some professional mental health workers. However, there has been limited research to assess this intervention. A recent case series using the MsV approach reported promising results across a number of standardised outcome measures. The current study reports on the voice hearers’ experience of having received the MsV intervention, through the use of “exit interviews” conducted as part of the case series. Individual participants’ experiences indicated a range of reactions to the intervention. Positive outcomes appeared to relate to a better understanding of voice hearing experiences and a greater sense of control over voices. Not all participants reported a positive experience of communicating with their voices. Outcomes are discussed within the context of potential common and distinct “ingredients” of the MsV approach, compared to other approaches to working with distressing voices.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig Steel & Joachim Schnackenberg & Zoe Travers & Eleanor Longden & Emily Greenfield & Lynette Meredith & Hayley Perry & Dirk Corstens, 2020. "Voice hearers’ experiences of the Making Sense of Voices approach in an NHS setting," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 106-114, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:106-114
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2019.1707859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2019.1707859
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2019.1707859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:106-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.