IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v12y2020i1p11-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hearing voices, sexual abuse and service system responses

Author

Listed:
  • Kath Sellick
  • David Rose
  • Louise Harms

Abstract

Research indicates that routine effective screening for sexual abuse by mental health professionals is infrequent, and when experiences of sexual abuse are disclosed to mental health professionals it is unclear whether these disclosures are meaningfully incorporated into professional formulations and treatment plans. Screening rates and inclusion of trauma details on formulations and treatment plans appear to be less common amongst consumers with psychotic diagnoses. The aim of this study was to further investigate the work practices of mental health professionals who engage with consumers who hear voices and have experienced sexual abuse. The results indicate over half of respondents were not routinely screening voice hearers for sexual abuse or assault. The findings also point to a number of mediating factors that influence whether or not mental health professionals screen for abuse. When respondents were aware of sexual abuse histories most included this information in their professional formulations and treatment plans but struggled to implement effective trauma related treatment plans due to a lack of trauma-specific services. These findings indicate a need for organisational and systemic leadership to address barriers to effective responses to sexual abuse survivors.

Suggested Citation

  • Kath Sellick & David Rose & Louise Harms, 2020. "Hearing voices, sexual abuse and service system responses," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 11-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:11-22
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2019.1666910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2019.1666910
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2019.1666910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:11-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.