IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v11y2019i4p331-341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shame triggers paranoid symptoms in adolescents with elevated psychosis proneness

Author

Listed:
  • Timo Hennig

Abstract

Paranoia is common in psychotic disorders, tends to cause suffering, and is difficult to successfully treat. Knowledge about causes and precursors of paranoia is needed to enable prevention. Theoretical models stress the significance of negative affect in the emergence of paranoia. Experimental research is needed to test these assumptions. It was expected that shame as a specific negative emotion would trigger paranoid symptoms, especially in adolescents with elevated psychosis proneness. In an experimental online study, 297 adolescents from the general population (14–17 years) were randomly assigned to a shame induction versus comparison condition. The induction successfully induced shame, but there were no differences between the groups in paranoid symptoms. However, there was a significant indirect effect from the induction on paranoid symptoms through shame but not through any of the other investigated affective states (anxiety, sadness, happiness, anger). As expected, psychosis proneness served as a moderator. Among participants with elevated psychosis proneness (n = 115), paranoid symptoms were higher in the shame group than in the comparison group (d = 0.37, p = .048). Results imply that shame triggers paranoid symptoms in adolescents with elevated psychosis proneness. If further corroborated, shame and how to deal with it could be worthy targets of interventions to prevent paranoia.

Suggested Citation

  • Timo Hennig, 2019. "Shame triggers paranoid symptoms in adolescents with elevated psychosis proneness," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 331-341, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:331-341
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2019.1634125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2019.1634125
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2019.1634125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:331-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.