IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v11y2019i2p128-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer support work on an inpatient unit for adults experiencing psychosis

Author

Listed:
  • Helen J. Wood
  • Susan Brown Padilla

Abstract

Peer support work is now recognized as a valuable component of mental health services. Although a number of studies have been published, the evidence base is inconsistent. There is relatively little literature on peer support work in an inpatient context, and even less about peer support specifically for adults experiencing psychosis in an inpatient setting. Barriers to peer work in this environment may be significant, yet these potential obstacles make inpatient peer work all the more important. Indeed, some of the earliest examples of peer support derive from supporting individuals experiencing psychosis in residential settings. This first-person peer account and discussion give voice to a peer’s experience of such work, demonstrating not only that it is possible, but that its impact can be wide-reaching for both consumers and multidisciplinary teams. This peer author’s work impacts the experience of hospitalization and recovery journeys of individuals, as well as staff’s capacity to relate to consumers and provide therapeutic care. More qualitative research is needed to understand and expand on these influences.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen J. Wood & Susan Brown Padilla, 2019. "Peer support work on an inpatient unit for adults experiencing psychosis," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 128-137, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:128-137
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2019.1603321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2019.1603321
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2019.1603321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:128-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.