IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v11y2019i1p42-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence for the continuum-severity model of psychosis through scrutiny of the architecture of symptoms associated with schizophrenia

Author

Listed:
  • Colin R. Martin
  • Mick Fleming

Abstract

The psychosis continuum provides a framework to develop a compelling insight into the architecture of psychotic experiences in non-clinical samples. Using schizophrenia-specific measures within non-clinical samples offers further opportunity to investigate psychotic experiences and compare to those reported in clinical samples.A cross sectional survey method was used to collect data from a non-clinical sample (n = 510) using the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale-Revision 4 (SQLS-R4) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).Conducting confirmatory factor analysis and bi-factor modelling found that a bi-factor model offered a better model fit to the data than the established two factor model. A general factor explained most item variance whilst seven domain specific factors explained a further small amount of item variance. Participants with higher anxiety reported comparatively poorer Quality of Life to those with lower anxiety. Comparison with data taken from a clinical sample found similarities in both the internal consistency and correlation coefficients between SQLS-R4 totals and sub-scales and HADS total scores and sub-scales.These results show the presence of a robust general psychosis Quality of Life factor within a non-clinical sample. The use of schizophrenia-specific measures and bi-factor modelling can provide suitable methods for investigating the nature of the psychosis continuum.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin R. Martin & Mick Fleming, 2019. "Evidence for the continuum-severity model of psychosis through scrutiny of the architecture of symptoms associated with schizophrenia," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 42-53, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:42-53
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2018.1545861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2018.1545861
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2018.1545861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:42-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.