IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsyxx/v10y2018i4p251-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence of psychotic-like experiences and associated distress in adolescent community, sexual-trauma and clinical samples

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Nolan
  • Siobhan Murphy
  • Tara O’Neill
  • James Houston
  • Jamie Murphy
  • Mark Shevlin

Abstract

The current study sought to assess and compare the frequency of psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) and the associated levels of distress across three groups (adolescent community, sexual-trauma survivors, and a clinical group of participants with serious mental health problems). Participants completed a revised version of the adolescent psychotic-like symptom screener (APSS) that was adapted to include ratings of the degree of distress associated with each PLE. Results showed that the adolescent community sample was less likely to report PLEs and found them less distressing compared to the sexual-trauma survivors and clinical sample. Sexual-trauma survivors reported more frequent PLEs and found them more distressing than the adolescent community sample. The clinical sample consistently reported more PLEs than both the adolescent community and sexual-trauma sample, and was more likely to report PLEs as very distressing. The most distressing PLEs for the adolescent community sample was paranoia, for the sexual-trauma and clinical sample they were paranoia and auditory hallucinations. These results provide support for the cognitive approach to psychosis, add further support to the hypothesis of a psychosis continuum, and perhaps indirectly, provide evidence for a continuum of distress that maps onto an inferred continuum of risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Nolan & Siobhan Murphy & Tara O’Neill & James Houston & Jamie Murphy & Mark Shevlin, 2018. "Prevalence of psychotic-like experiences and associated distress in adolescent community, sexual-trauma and clinical samples," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 251-262, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:251-262
    DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2018.1511745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17522439.2018.1511745
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17522439.2018.1511745?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsyxx:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:251-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPSY20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.