IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpstxx/v80y2026i2p239-256.html

Cohort fertility differences between men and women in a developed population: Evidence from Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Requena
  • David S. Reher

Abstract

Despite its significance, men’s fertility has been largely overlooked in demographic research. This study seeks to address this gap by conducting a systematic comparative analysis of men’s and women’s fertility using data from the Spanish ECEPOV–2021 survey, a large-scale data set (N = 424,493) from the Spanish national statistical office. Findings indicate that women generally exhibit slightly higher completed cohort fertility rates than men, with exceptions among remarried, college-educated, and immigrant men, who show higher fertility than their female counterparts. Childlessness emerges as a key factor underlying fertility differentials between the sexes, accounting for nearly half of the observed difference. After using matching techniques to control for compositional differences, the study concludes that adjusting for demographic and socio-economic factors significantly reduces, although does not entirely eliminate, the fertility differential. Residual differences may stem from measurement errors, selection biases, or unmeasured variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Requena & David S. Reher, 2026. "Cohort fertility differences between men and women in a developed population: Evidence from Spain," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(2), pages 239-256, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:80:y:2026:i:2:p:239-256
    DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2025.2573930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00324728.2025.2573930
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00324728.2025.2573930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpstxx:v:80:y:2026:i:2:p:239-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpst20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.