IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsaxx/v42y2026i2p140-149.html

Research on language in wartime: a critical ethnographic sociolinguistic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Kudriavtseva

Abstract

In this article, I reflect on the challenges of conducting research on language in wartime Ukraine from the perspective of critical sociolinguistics. Situated within Ukraine’s nation-building debates, the issue of language has been intensified by ongoing Russian aggression. Considering the ideological framing of language as both a marker of patriotism and a site of political contestation, I follow a critical ethnographic sociolinguistic approach that foregrounds language as a political, social, and economic resource, while also emphasizing the researcher’s positionality. Drawing on my own research, which combines participant observation and biographical interviews, I demonstrate how wartime heightens symbolic and emotional investments in language. Theoretically, wartime language dynamics are underpinned by the concept of the linguistic repertoire, approached through interactional, poststructuralist, and phenomenological lenses. I advocate for methodological flexibility and trust-building techniques, and I approach the choice of interview language from a code-meshing perspective. By foregrounding language as fluid and socially embedded, this article contributes to rethinking ethnography in contexts of instability and war, suggesting that such conditions also reshape the epistemological frameworks of linguistic and social research.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Kudriavtseva, 2026. "Research on language in wartime: a critical ethnographic sociolinguistic approach," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 140-149, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:140-149
    DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2025.2562874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1060586X.2025.2562874
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1060586X.2025.2562874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:140-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpsa .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.