IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsaxx/v41y2025i6p573-592.html

Two implications of survey research mode during war: evidence from Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron Erlich

Abstract

Conducting social science research during an active war raises distinct challenges. To investigate the relationship between mode and both coverage and social desirability bias during wartime, I conduct a multi-mode study (web, telephone) with two independently drawn samples of the Ukrainian population during Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in the summer of 2022. I employ identical demographic and behavioral questions in both surveys to examine coverage bias and pre-register a framing experiment to investigate social desirability bias in reported volunteering activities after the onset of the full-scale invasion. Observationally, I find that because web studies cannot reach the oldest and most rural Ukrainians, they likely contain much more significant coverage bias with respect to war-related demographic variables compared to the telephone sample. Experimentally, consistent with other studies that report greater social desirability bias in interviewer-mediated models, I find evidence of inflation in reporting volunteering activities only in the telephone survey. The results demonstrate that, given modern survey techniques, wartime attitudes and behavior in Ukraine can be reliably measured, but there is a trade-off in survey modes between coverage bias and social desirability bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron Erlich, 2025. "Two implications of survey research mode during war: evidence from Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 573-592, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:41:y:2025:i:6:p:573-592
    DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2025.2529114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1060586X.2025.2529114
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1060586X.2025.2529114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:41:y:2025:i:6:p:573-592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpsa .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.