IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsaxx/v41y2025i6p544-572.html

Neoliberal authoritarianism and the partial decriminalization of sex work in Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Hélène Thibault

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of gender authoritarian policymaking by attempting to explain why the government of Kazakhstan partially decriminalized sex work in 2001. Scholars have argued that authoritarian states adopt gender-related policies to gain legitimacy, either internal or external or, in the specific case of Central Asia, that policymaking is deeply connected to regional authoritarian diffusion, heavily influenced by Russia. I show that this decision was not made for legitimacy purposes, as sex work decriminalization is contentious both locally and globally. Kazakhstan is one of only two Central Asian countries to have partially decriminalized sex work, challenging assumptions about legal harmonization across the region. Instead, I explain this decision by the pervasive neoliberal character of the state toward private matters and gendered hierarchies embedded within state structures. Based on interviews with activists and archival research, I demonstrate that partial decriminalization: (1) allows the state to disengage from this morally sensitive matter that does not threaten the political order; (2) marginalizes sex workers by putting the moral responsibility and legal liability on them while customers remain unaffected. In that sense, the partial decriminalization of sex work is a policy that displays an evident gender bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Hélène Thibault, 2025. "Neoliberal authoritarianism and the partial decriminalization of sex work in Kazakhstan," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 544-572, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:41:y:2025:i:6:p:544-572
    DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2025.2536442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1060586X.2025.2536442
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1060586X.2025.2536442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:41:y:2025:i:6:p:544-572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpsa .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.