IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsaxx/v41y2025i4p376-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-purpose populist policymaking in practice: the Polish academic evaluation reform

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Maria Piotrowska
  • Izabela Szkurłat
  • Magdalena Szydłowska

Abstract

This paper theorizes populist policymaking as multi-purpose governance that can simultaneously deliver responsiveness, ideological consolidation, and institutionalized patronage. We apply this framework to the reform of Poland’s academic journal evaluation system introduced under the Law and Justice (PiS) government. By altering the number of points assigned to journals, the policy redefined academic prestige and resource distribution. Our analysis of more than 30,000 journals before and after the reform shows that Polish-published and humanities journals received a disproportionate boost – consistent with a narrative of responsiveness – but that journals affiliated with Catholic institutions, closely aligned with the ruling party, benefited most significantly. Hence, while presented as a response to concerns among humanities scholars about the side effects of research internationalization, the reform also advanced a conservative- nationalist agenda and disproportionately benefited pro-government institutions. These findings illustrate how populist reforms can be formally legal yet designed to embed ideological content and reward loyal actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Maria Piotrowska & Izabela Szkurłat & Magdalena Szydłowska, 2025. "Multi-purpose populist policymaking in practice: the Polish academic evaluation reform," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 376-399, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:41:y:2025:i:4:p:376-399
    DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2025.2520719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1060586X.2025.2520719
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1060586X.2025.2520719?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:41:y:2025:i:4:p:376-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpsa .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.