IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rppexx/v41y2026i2p377-395.html

Shaping and transposing: an analysis of the impacts of case law on the evolution of planning practice in twentieth century England & Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Botea Carr

Abstract

The impacts of case law on the conceptual evolution of planning practice are important to the fields of administrative law and town planning in the context of the common law jurisdiction of England & Wales, yet they remain under-examined in the literature of both fields. This paper utilizes historical institutionalist theory to analyse the emergence of distinct planning practices, drawing on relevant legislation and citing case law from 1909–1986. In examining planning’s emergence from the milieu of the law on housing, public health, and administration, broader contexts across the chosen timeline are considered, in terms of the amount of activity seen through annual planning applications and appeals, and in terms of the legal, political, and economic contexts of the period. These layers of context reveal the ways in which planning actors have historically turned to case law to shape the boundaries of administrative power and how the courts, in deciding planning cases, transposed their approach from better established areas of case law, thereby fixing planning practice on new path dependent processes. It is concluded that case law between 1909 and 1986 formed part of the context for, and directly shaped, the evolution of planning practice in the twentieth century.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Botea Carr, 2026. "Shaping and transposing: an analysis of the impacts of case law on the evolution of planning practice in twentieth century England & Wales," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 377-395, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:41:y:2026:i:2:p:377-395
    DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2025.2483357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02665433.2025.2483357
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02665433.2025.2483357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:41:y:2026:i:2:p:377-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rppe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.