IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rppexx/v41y2026i1p71-89.html

The city beautiful, the city sustainable, the city profitable: what changed in Chicago’s planning priorities after a century?

Author

Listed:
  • Sonia A. Hirt
  • Sarah Z. Beeson

Abstract

This essay explores continuity and change in the planning of Chicago between the early 1900s and the early 2000s. We chose Chicago because of the important role it has played in the development of the US planning profession. Specifically, the essay compares and contrasts the principal priorities reflected in Chicago’s first comprehensive regional plan from 1909 and its comprehensive regional plan from a century later. We used content analysis with both manual coding and AI. To select the coding categories, we relied on a conceptual framework published in a recent theory/history article, which posited that one way to understand the main priorities of the US planning profession is to organize them along five axes: economy, equity, environment (these are often termed the 3 Es), public health/wellness, and the aesthetic aspects of urbanism. We found notable changes in most of the priorities we test, but strong signs of continuity in treating the economy as a top goal. In both plans, economic priorities unambiguously dominate all others.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonia A. Hirt & Sarah Z. Beeson, 2026. "The city beautiful, the city sustainable, the city profitable: what changed in Chicago’s planning priorities after a century?," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 71-89, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:41:y:2026:i:1:p:71-89
    DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2025.2604154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02665433.2025.2604154
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02665433.2025.2604154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:41:y:2026:i:1:p:71-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rppe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.