IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rppexx/v40y2025i5p1099-1132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Baroque Rome was not planned in a day: forms of immunity in Alexander VII’s and Louis XIV’s urban strategies (1656–68)

Author

Listed:
  • Fabio Gigone

Abstract

In the seventeenth century, Rome’s urban territory was legally contested, particularly during the 1660s when the Popes sought to assert power over the foreign states’ territorial claims. The papacy’s influence on the urban landscape was traditionally marked by extensive building activities that bolstered its financial resources, despite a decline in temporal power evidenced by diplomatic failures in the mid-1600s. Ecclesiastical immunities and privileges were employed as legal tools to generate income and reclaim urban territory, while European powers pursued ambassadorial extraterritoriality. Two crises, the 1656–1657 plague and the expansion of Louis XIV’s diplomatic immunities, exposed papal authority, prompting Pope Alexander VII to use architecture to reformulate his political aims. This paper argues that the concept of ‘immunity’ is key to understanding the significant urban and architectural forces that shaped Rome’s Baroque city.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabio Gigone, 2025. "Baroque Rome was not planned in a day: forms of immunity in Alexander VII’s and Louis XIV’s urban strategies (1656–68)," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 1099-1132, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:40:y:2025:i:5:p:1099-1132
    DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2025.2529302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02665433.2025.2529302
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02665433.2025.2529302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:40:y:2025:i:5:p:1099-1132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rppe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.