IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rppexx/v33y2018i2p185-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An early engagement with town planning: Māori and the Commission to inquire and report upon the necessity or advisability of establishing model villages on the sites of the present villages of Ohinemutu and Whakarewarewa in 1926

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Miller

Abstract

The history of state-sanctioned planning is generally urban and commences in the early twentieth century. It is a history in which Indigenous people remain relatively invisible until the 1980s. By the 1920s, New Zealand’s Indigenous people, Māori, despite having lost much of their land, remained a visible presence in society. In Rotorua, the traditional Māori villages of Ohinemutu and Whakarewarewa were central to the tourism industry, and were sites of important economic activity for Ngati Whakaue and Tūhourangi. In 1926, Ngati Whakaue and Tūhourangi took an active part in a Commission of Inquiry into the housing in their villages, in an attempt to improve their liveability. The Commission sought to apply town planning principles to their work at a time when town planning legislation had only recently been introduced. This appears to be an early involvement of Indigenous people with town planning and an important part of New Zealand’s planning history.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Miller, 2018. "An early engagement with town planning: Māori and the Commission to inquire and report upon the necessity or advisability of establishing model villages on the sites of the present villages of Ohinemu," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 185-204, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:33:y:2018:i:2:p:185-204
    DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2017.1348972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02665433.2017.1348972
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02665433.2017.1348972?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:33:y:2018:i:2:p:185-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rppe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.