IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rppexx/v31y2016i4p563-584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Refashioning urban space in postwar Toronto: the Wood-Wellesley redevelopment area, 1952–1957

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Lewis
  • Paul Hess

Abstract

This paper considers the creation and the subsequent meaning of ‘redevelopment areas’ in Toronto in the 1950s. The city passed a bylaw in 1952 that defined blighted areas as suitable for redevelopment. One of these areas was the downtown district that runs between Wood and Wellesley streets. The history of the Wood-Wellesley redevelopment area between 1952 and 1957 was important in several ways: it built on but differed from similar activity in the USA; it discursively reflected the needs of the city to refashion itself as a modern landscape; it provided the city with the tools to turn planning ideas into action; and it gave developers the forum by which they could push for specific areas of the city to be opened up for investment. Politically calculated and heavily contested visions of urban space, redevelopment areas such as Wood-Wellesley were used by the state and developers to physically reconstruct Toronto’s downtown area for private capital, to create a new modernist landscape, and to reproduce new and to reinforce existing social inequalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Lewis & Paul Hess, 2016. "Refashioning urban space in postwar Toronto: the Wood-Wellesley redevelopment area, 1952–1957," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 563-584, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:31:y:2016:i:4:p:563-584
    DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2016.1174073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02665433.2016.1174073
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02665433.2016.1174073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:31:y:2016:i:4:p:563-584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rppe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.