IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v9y2009i2p228-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of singles and doubles badminton: heart rate response, player profiles and game characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Alison Alcock
  • N. Tim Cable

Abstract

Physiological demands of singles and doubles badminton were compared to assist coaches in evidence-based design of training programs. Sixteen male players (eight singles and eight doubles) were tested for physical and physiological characteristics. Heart rates were monitored during competition and games videoed to allow for lapsed-time analysis. Mean and peak heart rates were significantly greater in singles (88.8% and 96.8% of maximal heart rate respectively) than doubles (75.5% and 89.0%). Singles players took more steps per game (593.8 vs 314.5) and at a higher velocity. There were no differences in rally or game length. Singles players had greater predicted VO2max (50.6 vs 45.5 ml·kg-1 ·min-1) and flexibility, and lower body fat levels (15.5% vs 21.9%). There were no differences in power, speed or agility. Game analyses showed tactical differences, with 89.6% of shots in singles played to the extreme fore- and rear-court (clear, drop, lift or net shot) or a smash, and doubles involving a greater diversity of shots. Success in badminton may require focusing on specific discipline strategies. For example, singles training drills could focus on efficient movement about the court and doubles on a faster, more attacking game.

Suggested Citation

  • Alison Alcock & N. Tim Cable, 2009. "A comparison of singles and doubles badminton: heart rate response, player profiles and game characteristics," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 228-237, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:9:y:2009:i:2:p:228-237
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2009.11868479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2009.11868479
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2009.11868479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:9:y:2009:i:2:p:228-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.