IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v9y2009i1p90-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of External Cues on Learning Setting in Volleyball

Author

Listed:
  • Yannis Laios
  • Panayiotis Kountouris

Abstract

The present study investigated the hypotheses that beginners in volleyball can attain and retain higher levels of precision in setting if their training includes external cues, especially variable verbal cues. To this purpose 72 subjects were divided into the control, visual, auditory, and variable auditory groups, based on the results of the initial measurement and were trained accordingly for 12 one-hour sessions. The subjects were tested at the end of training and five days after that for the evaluation of the retention of learning. Each measurement included two batteries of eight settings at random targets, issued with visual and auditory cues. The parameter analyzed was the success ratio. The results indicated that performance improvement and retention of learning of the setting skill for beginners in volleyball is significantly enhanced if their training includes external cues. Practicing with variable auditory cues demonstrated the best results, thus providing validation for the variability-of-practice hypothesis. Practicing with visual cues seems to give better results in the case of setting at the target with which the subject has no visual contact. Apart from providing positive evidence for a number of crucial hypotheses in motor learning, the present results may also prove useful to volleyball coaches and players.

Suggested Citation

  • Yannis Laios & Panayiotis Kountouris, 2009. "The Effectiveness of External Cues on Learning Setting in Volleyball," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 90-99, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:9:y:2009:i:1:p:90-99
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2009.11868466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2009.11868466
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2009.11868466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:9:y:2009:i:1:p:90-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.